Skip to main content
Download PDF

Assessing knowledge of herbal medicine course for dental students

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 22, Article number: 319 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aims of this article are to assess dental students’ knowledge about herbal medicine usage and the potential benefits and side effects, and to conduct a short course about herbal medicine.

Methods

All fourth-year pre-doctoral students were invited to participate in a herbal medicine course as a test while the sixth-year students were the control group. A survey was tested for validity and reliability. It comprised of 16 multiple choice questions was given before the course and one month after the course. The sum score of knowledge for each participant was calcuated based on the ability to identify the use of herbs in dentistry with high-quality evidence (correct answer) or total answer for periodontal disease and caries.

Results

The response rate for completing the study was 112 fourth-year students (73.7%) and 64 sixth-year students (39.0%). More than half of the participants (52.5%) were unsure about the importance of herbal medicine in dentistry. However, the majority also stated that the most common herbs used in dentistry were clove (62.9%), followed by curcuma turmeric (54.7%) and meswak (43.0%). The fourth-year students displayed evidence of a higher overall knowledge score after the course in herbal medicine related to periodontal disease in total and correct answers (mean 4.48 ± 4.13, 3.73 ± 3.31, respectively) compared to before the course (mean 0.84 ± 1.23, 0.74 ± 1.16, respectively) (p-value < 0.001). The post-course periodontal disease total and correct answers were statistically significant between fourth- and sixth-year students.

Conclusion

Herbal medicine has a potential positive impact on dentistry. However, these effects are not fully investigated and received full attention in academic institute. This short educational program related to medicinal herbs can improve the knowledge of dental students. This will help increase the awareness about the use and potential side effects of herbal medicine in the dental field.

Peer Review reports

Background

The use of herbal medicine/supplements is popular throughout the world, including developed countries [1,2,3,4]. In 2007, 17.7% of the United States’ adult population had used some form of herbal supplement [5], spending about $15 billion on them [5]. These supplements are also known as “non-vitamin, non-mineral, natural products” [5]. Many individuals take them for disease treatment and pain related to the back (17.1%), neck (5.9%), joints (5.2%), and arthritis (3.5%)[6]. Most users were females and above 40 years old [6].

Herbal medicine is part of the complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) field [1,2,3,4, 7, 8], which focuses on the treatments and procedures administered alongside or instead of conventional therapy [1,2,3,4, 7, 8]. CAM is divided into three groups: (a) natural products; (b) mind and body practices; and (c) other complementary health approaches [1, 2, 7, 8].

Thus far, most research on the knowledge and perception has focused on adults or students [9,10,11,12]. There have also been several studies conducted on medical students [9,10,11,12]. However, very limited research has been done among the dental students. Moreover, their usage, potential benefits, and side effects have not been confirmed. Hence, it was suggested to conduct a short course about herbal medicine based on the optimal available evidence on this topic.So, the aim of this study to present another effort to improve dentists’ knowledge through the introduction of specialized course in dental herbs medicine at faculty of dentistry at King Abdulaziz University (KAUFD). The course’s goal is to increase the dental students knowledge, resulting in better dental care, and to produce dentists equipped with the necessary awareness about dental herbal medicine.

Methods

Hypothesis:

After the course, the dental students will have expanded their knowledge of the uses of herbal medicine in dentistry compared to before the course.

Intervention:

King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry (KAUFD) developed a herbal medicine course to improve students’ knowledge about herbal medicine uses, impacts, and side effects. The course, which lasts a total of four hours, is held over two days in the Fall semester. It is optional and has a didactic component only in terms of lectures and discussion. The predoctoral program lasts six years in total; the herbal medicine course was introduced for fourth-year students, which is their first year of clinical practice.

Study Design:

The study consisted of two groups: fourth-year students, who were invited to take the course as a test group, and the sixth-year students, who did not take the course as a control (Fig. 1). Neither group were informed at the beginning whether they were in the test or control group. The study was approved by the ethical committee at KAUFD (# 295-10-21).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study design

Full size image

The lecture was created according to the evidence-based dentistry concept of what has been published in herbal medicine [13,14,15,16,17]. In another way, more credit was given to high-quality meta-analysis, systematic review, randomized clinical trials, and cohort, while less credit was given to low-quality cross-sectional studies and reviews.

Survey validation and relibilaity

A survey containing 16 multiple-choice questions, and which included an “I don’t know” option for several questions, was distributed before and one month after the course. A survey questions was then established based on the materials that will be covered in the lecture. The survey was tested for content validity and distributed to 8 individuals with expertise in some aspect of the subject matter. These individuals included herbal medicine experts and dental consultants in oral medicine, restorative dentistry, periodontics, and maxillofacial surgery. They were asked to check and rate the importance of each question using a five-point Likert scale (from 1 = very important to 5 = not important). They determined if an item should be included in the questionnaire. For face validity, the same survey was reviewed by four different fifth-year students to confirm the clarity of the questions before distribution. They repeated the survey a second time after a one-week period. The results were compared for consistency by calculating kappa statistics which was ranged between 0.78 and 0.86. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ) was 0.738 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.671–0.795) for periodontal disease and 0.806 (95% CI: 0.757–0.848) for caries. We modified the web survey based on the results of face and content testing, as well as the results of the reliability testing.

Questions were related to: (1) demographic such as gender, level, and marital status (4 questions); (2) personal opinion and use of herbal medicine (7 questions ); (3) herbal medicine and dentistry (5 questions). Participants understood that the course was voluntary and would not be graded. The participating students also completed an electronic consent form. Student ID number was used as the link between the two surveys.

Sample size and data analysis :

This is a pilot study as we did not find a similar study design in the dental field. It was a convenience sampling of fourth and sixth -year students who voluntarily participated in this study. All data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Responses of each question were summarized to create an overall frequency and percentage. The sum score of knowledge for each participant was calcuated based on the ability to identify the potential use of herbs in dentistry with high-quality evidence (correct answer) or total answer for periodontal disease and caries. To do this step, first we identified all the systematic review, clinical trial and observational study (cohort and case control studies only ) articles which linked between herbs and dentistry. Then, identified if a herb could be potentially benefical in periodontal disease disease or caries or not at all. These answers were considered the correct answers. We analyzed all the students answers (total) including incorrect answers. This was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A significant difference is described as a p value less than 0.05.

Results

Description of the sample:

The pre-course survey was sent to 316 students (152 fourth-year and 164 sixth-year students) and the response rate was 100%. However, the students who agreed to take the course comprised 114 students among the fourth-year respondents (74.0%). Out of the total fourth- and sixth-year students, those who answered the post-course survey comprised 112 fourth-year students (73.7%) and 64 sixth-year students (39.0%) ( Fig. 1). There were 37 females and 27 males among the sixth-year students and 61 females and 53 males among the fourth-year students. Only two students were married; both were female, and each was from each year group .

Overall personal opinion and use of herbal medicine:

The fourth-year students ( test group ) displayed evidence of a higher overall knowledge score after the course in herbal medicine related to periodontal disease in total and correct answers (mean 4.48 ± 4.13, 3.73 ± 3.31, respectively) compared to before the course (mean 0.84 ± 1.23, 0.74 ± 1.16, respectively) (p-value < 0.001). The post-course periodontal disease total (4.48 ± 4.13 vs. 0.59 ± 0.87 ) and correct answers (3.73 ± 3.31 vs. 0.52 ± 0.79 ) were statistically significant between fourth (test)- and sixth (control)-year students (P-value < 0.001).

Individual personal opinion and use of herbal medicine:

The majority of the participants believed that it is beneficial to use herbal medicine (85.4%) and had not noticed any side effects during personal use or other use (93.7%) (Table 1). However, only 69.6% of them had previously used herbal medicine. Among those who had not yet used it, the main reasons for not using it were “do not know much about it” (77.1%) followed by “no reason” (55.2%). The main sources of the information regarding herbal medicine were elderly relatives (77.8%), followed by Internet (51.6%) and friends (44.3%). Most agreed that their patients should tell the physician if they used it (90.5%). However, some barriers were identified, such as insufficient scientific evidence (62.7%) and lack of trained professionals (37.0%) (Table 2). Among those who had used herbal medicine before, ginger was the most commonly used remedy (63.7%) followed by green tea (54.0%), cinnamon (42.7%), and black seed (43.3%) (Table 2).

Table 1 Personal opinion and use of herbal medicine of all study sample
Full size table
Table 2 The most common herbs used among the dental students participants who used before any type of herbs
Full size table

Herbal medicine and dentistry:

More than half of the participants were unsure about the importance of herbal medicine in dentistry (52.5%). (Table 3). However, they mentioned that the most common herbs used in dentistry were clove (62.9%), followed by curcuma turmeric (54.7%) and meswak (43.0%) (Table 3).

Table 3 The most common herbs used in dentistry
Full size table

Meswak and commiphora myrrha were the most commonly mentioned remedies for periodontal disease before and after the lecture, while clove and meswak were the most common herbs mentioned for use in caries prevention among the test group (Table 4). The answers were almost identical for the control group; however, the percentages were much lower (Table 5).

Table 4 The most common herbs used in caries prevention and periodontal disease among the test group (herbs course)
Full size table
Table 5 The most common herbs used in caries prevention and periodontal disease among the control group ( no herbs course)
Full size table

Sum score of knowledge:

There was a significant improvement was seen in all subjects’ total knowledge regarding periodontal herbs ( mean of answers was 0.83 before the program and 3.09 after one month) ( p < 0.001) (Table 6). The mean of the correct answer was increased significantly as well (0.70, and 1.58, respectively, p < 0.001 ± 3.09 ). The sum score of knowledge of total and correct answers regarding caries was higher after the program. However, it was not statistical significant (Table 6).

Table 6 The sum score of knowledge based in the ability to identify the herbs with high-quality evidence (correct answer) or total answer for periodontal disease and caries
Full size table

Discussion

Several studies have been conducted to assess the perceptions and knowledge of different population groups regarding herbs [18, 19]. However, few articles have been conducted in the dental field [20,21,22]. In the medical field, Yeo et al. found that 92% of medical students believed that conventional medicine would be more effective than herbs [9]. In our study, 85.4% of participating dental students believed that herbs are beneficial. Their main sources of information are the elderly, the Internet, and friends.

In the dental field, only 25% believed that herbal medicine is beneficial and the remainder were either unsure or did not think. The main reasons were insufficient scientific evidence and lack of trained professionals, which is in agreement with Harris et al., who found that 53.0% of students did not prefer to use herbal therapies if there is no scientific evidence to support them [23].

Most oral health issues were associated with bacterial plaque, the removal of which will improve oral health [24, 25]. Mechanical or chemical removal of plaque is most common. One chemical method is the mouth rinse, which can prevent or facilitate the plaque removal; these treatments are an adjunct method, and herbal medicine was introduced and experimented in different forms to prevent the development of plaque chemically [24, 25].

Several published articles demonstrate the potential benefits of herbal medicine against dental caries and periodontal disease [15]. These treatments/preventions could be safer due to reduced toxicity and cheaper than chemical drugs. For example, neem, eucalyptus, tulsi, and clove have antibacterial properties, which can help to treat forms of gingival inflammation [16]. Herbal medicine is useful in several cases such as caries prevention, toothache, mouth ulcers, gingivitis, mouth ulcers, oral thrush, and hairy tongue [14]. Some of these herbs have been recommended even for titanium implant coating such as Malus Domestica (apple), and for periodontal filler in periodontal regeneration such as Cissusquadrangularis (veldt grape) and Carthamustinctorius (safflower) [17].

Arabic culture overall has a strong belief in herbal medicine, due to its significant historical background in traditional Arab medicine [26]. However, the current research in this field in the Arabic region is small, with limited up-to-date knowledge on the Arabic forms of herbs [27, 28]. According to a survey, out of the 2,600 plant species in the Middle East, more than 700 plant are known to be used as medicinal herbs. Currently, traditional Arab medicine uses less than 200–250 plant species for the treatment of multiple diseases [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The current status of Arab herbal medicine is concerning, because it is not part of the curriculum nor has any specific academic programs to support. In other countries, India has 57 universities and research institutes that focus on traditional medicine, while South Korea has established 12 universities and institutes focusing on traditional Korean medicine [29].

A possible limitation of this research is that only about 75% of the participants took the course. We are not sure about the grade level of the students who did not participate and we did not evaluate whether the course would cause any burden to their studies. Another problem is that the students knew the course was not graded, and thus may not have taken it seriously. Moreover, we are comparing between fourth-year students (test) and sixth-year students (control), which could create bias because the sixth-year students have been exposed to more dental materials/patients and may be more aware of herbal medicine. However, the baseline analysis did not reveal any significant difference between them. This course did not evaluate the family background of the participants which might affect the results. Another limitation is the drop out in the control group (60%) which might affect the results, and there was a chance for the control group to read more about herbal medicine and educate themselves before the follow up. However, they did not know the actual date of the follow up, and there was no significant results when we compared knowledge changes in the control group. In addition, this is the first course and we are expecting to face these difficulties and we tried to encourage and remind the students to participate in this research.

Conclusion

Herbal medicine has a potentially positive impact on dentistry. However, these effects have not been fully investigated and have received insufficient attention from academic institutions. A short educational program on medicinal herbs provided to dental students can improve their knowledge of the field. This will help increase awareness about the use and potential side effects of herbal medicine. However, further investigation is necessary to assess the long-term effects of the program.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CAM:

Complementary and alternative medicine

KAUFD:

King Abdulaziz university faculty of dentistry

References

  1. Saha BL, Seam MOR, Islam MM, Das A, Ahamed SK, Karmakar P, Islam MF, Kundu SK. General perception and self-practice of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among undergraduate pharmacy students of Bangladesh. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017;17(1):314.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. James PB, Bah AJ. Awareness, use, attitude and perceived need for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) education among undergraduate pharmacy stu¬dents in Sierra Leone: a descriptive cross-sectional survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao A, Shakeel M, Trindade A, Rao G, Pearce A, Ah-See KW. The importance of complementary and alternative Medicine Education in Medical School. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;17(3):191–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koithan M. Introducing complementary and alternative therapies. J Nurse Pract. 2009;5(1):18–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative 1. medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Centers for Disease Control. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr012.pdf. Published December 10, 2008. Accessed Nov 16, 2021.

  6. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280(18):1569–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What’s In a Name?; 2015. Available from: https://nccih.nih.gov/health/integrative-health. Accessed Nov 16, 2021.

  8. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Mayo Clinic- Book of Alternative Medicine. Zagreb: Medicinska naklada; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yeo AS, Yeo JC, Yeo C, Lee CH, Lim LF, Lee TL. Perceptions of complementary and alternative medicine amongst medical students in Singapore—a survey. Acupunct Med. 2005;23(1):19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu S, Levine M. Medical residents’ and students’ attitudes towards herbal medicines: a pilot study. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;15(1):e1–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA. 1998;279(19):1548–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ernst E. The role of complementary and alternative medicine. BMJ. 2000;321(7269):1133–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anushya P, Jothi Priya A, Arivarasu L. Role of herbal medicine in dental health- a detailed review. Eur J Molec Clin Med. 2020;7(1):2185–96.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Somaiday HM, Al-Samaray ME. Al-Samydai A. Role of Herbal Medicine in oral and Dental Health; Ethnopharmacological Study of Medicinal plants in Iraq/Baghdad, Int J Res Pharm Sci.2020: 553–560.

  15. Sinha DJ, Sinha AA. Natural medicaments in dentistry. Ayu. 2014;35(2):113–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lakshmi T, Krishnan V, Rajendran R, Madhusudhanan N. Azadirachta indica: a herbal panacea in dentistry - an update. Pharmacogn Rev. 2015;9(17):41–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nahar L. Role of herbal products in dental health, Dent Med Res. 2016;4:1–2.

  18. Zimmerman C, Kandiah J. A pilot study to assess students’ perceptions, Familiarity, and knowledge in the Use of complementary and alternative herbal supplements in Health Promotion. Altern Ther Health Med. 2012;18(5):28–33.

  19. Doko T, Salaric I, Bazdaric K. Complementary and alternative Medicine Use among Croatian Health Studies Students – a single Center Cross-Sectional Study. Acta Med Acad. 2020;49(3):240–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cruz Martínez C, Diaz Gómez M, Oh MS. Use of traditional herbal medicine as an alternative in dental treatment in mexican dentistry: a review. Pharm Biol. 2017;55(1):1992–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Taheri JB, Azimi S, Rafieian N, Zanjani HA. Herbs in dentistry. Int Dent J. 2011;61(6):287–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tam KK, Gadbury-Amyot CC, Cobb CM, Williams KB. Differences between herbal and nonherbal users in dental practice. J Dent Hyg. 2006;80(1):10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris IM, Kingston RL, Rodriquez R, Choudary V. Attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine among pharmacy faculty and students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(6):129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Janakiram C, Venkitachalam R, Fontelo P, Iafolla TJ, Dye BA. Effectiveness of herbal oral care products in reducing dental plaque & gingivitis - a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2020;20(1):43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Prabu GR, Gnanamani A, Sadulla S. Guaijaverin – a plant flavonoid as potential antiplaque agent against Streptococcus mutans, J Appl Microbiol. 2006:487–495.

  26. Saad B, Azaizeh H, Said O. Tradition and perspectives of arab herbal medicine: a review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2005 Dec;2(4):475–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shaikh BT, Hatcher J. Complementary and alternative medicine in Pakistan: prospects and limitations. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2005;2:139–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Said O, Khalil K, Fulder S, Azaizeh H. Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal herbs in Israel, the Golan Heights and the West Bank region. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;83:251–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lev E, Amar Z. Ethnopharmacological survey of traditional drugs sold in Israel at the end of the 20th century. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;72:191–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lev E, Amar Z. Ethnopharmacological survey of traditional drugs sold in the Kingdom of Jordan. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;82:131–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Azaizeh H, Fulder S, Khalil K, Said O. Ethnobotanical survey of local practitioners of the Middle Eastern region: the status of traditional arabic medicine. Fitoterapia. 2003;74:98–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. ALHarthi SSY, Natto ZS, Midle JB, et al. Association between time since quitting smoking and periodontitis in former smokers in the National Health and Nutrition examination surveys (NHANES) 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. 2019;90:16–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Natto ZS, Afeef M, Bakhrebah MA, et al. Can periodontal pockets and caries lesions act as reservoirs for coronavirus? Mol Oral Microbiol. 2022;37:77–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Natto ZS, Bakhrebah MA, Afeef M, et al. The short-term effect of different chlorhexidine forms versus povidone iodine mouth rinse in minimizing the oral SARS-CoV-2 viral load: an open label randomized controlled clinical trial study. Med (Baltim). 2022;101:e28925.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Aladmawy MA, Natto ZS, Kreitzer M, et al. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation using an allograft and nonresorbable membrane with and without primary closure: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Med (Baltim). 2022;101:e29769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Natto ZS, Alshehri MM, Alghamdi FK. Infection control practices at the dental clinics in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:2951–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Natto ZS, Afeef M, Khalil D, et al. Characteristics of oral manifestations in symptomatic non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study on a sample of the saudi population. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:9547–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Natto ZS, Alshaeri HK. Characteristics of first cases of coronavirus disease 2019 and the effort to prevent the early spread of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:315–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Natto ZS. Dental students’ knowledge and attitudes about electronic cigarettes: a cross-sectional study at one saudi university. J Dent Educ. 2020;84:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Zuhair S. Natto

  2. Department of Periodontology, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, MA, Boston, USA

    Zuhair S. Natto

  3. Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard University School of Dental medicine, MA, Boston, USA

    Zuhair S. Natto

Authors
  1. Zuhair S. Natto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZN contributed to all study steps which include :the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation and manuscript writing. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuhair S. Natto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This Study was approved by the ethical committee at King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry (KAUFD), # 295-10-21. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations or declaration of helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests 

The author declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natto, Z.S. Assessing knowledge of herbal medicine course for dental students. BMC Complement Med Ther 22, 319 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12906-022-03801-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12906-022-03801-z

Keywords

  • Herbal medicine
  • Dentistry
  • Course
  • Knowledge
  • Education

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us